Search for: "Carrie N. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 1:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Baker argued that Mann did not anticipatethe amended claims because “[n]owhere in Mann is therea teaching that the computer system is located remotelyfrom the teaching station as is emphasized in Applicant’sdisclosure. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
The only difference between the baker and the dress designer is that the dress designer disapproves of the Trump inauguration while the baker disapproves of same-sex weddings. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
§ 10706(a)(3)(B)(ii)(II), which provides that “[i]n any proceeding in which it is alleged that a carrier was a party to an agreement, conspiracy, or combination in violation of [certain federal laws, including the Sherman Act] … evidence of a discussion or agreement … shall not be admissible if the discussion or agreement [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
As Judge Baker stated,M.R.E. 414(a) provides that evidence of other acts of child molestation is admissible "[i]n a court martial in which the accused is charged with an offense of child molestation. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am by NARF
Baker: The difference an Indigenous leader makes Wild horses, buffalo and the politics of belonging [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Commission ruled against Phillips in part on the theory that any message the requested wedding cake would carry would be attributed to the customer, not to the baker. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Elizabeth Slattery and Carrie Severino in an episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Caroline Reilly at Rewire.News, Penny Nance in an op-ed for USA Today, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Charles Blow in an op-ed for The New York Times, and Andrew McCarthy in an op-ed for Fox News. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 10:49 am by Katherine Pompilio
A statement released by a Pentagon denied any involvement in “the Ukrainians' decision to strike the ship or in the operation they carried out. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
Segall at ACS Law, Carrie Severino at National Review, Timothy G. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
  However, as Tony Mauro of the BLT noted in his coverage of the day’s proceedings, “[n]one of the marquee cases that would make big headlines” – such as Bilski v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:05 pm
NMCCA 200600484, slip op. at 9 (N-M. [read post]