Search for: "Carrington v. United States" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, McAllen Division, issued an opinion on a case recently that dealt with this issue. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am by Durga Rao
The appellant could not involve in the day to day affairs of the second respondent company and other companies as he had to travel to United Kingdom often for his treatment. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm by Rosalind English
Right to liberty: Entick v Carrington (1765) Prohibition on retrospective liability: Philips v Eyre (1870) 6 QB 1 (see our recent post on this principle) Prohibition of torture has long been a “constitutional principle”, according to Lord Bingham in A & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 221 The right to fair trail, defined in the Magna Carter as “due process of the law” (Chapter 29 of the 1354… [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:12 am
In the United States, particularly, as early as in Guth v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
United States [Volokh Conspiracy] More Kerr on Carrington and mandate recall discretion [Sentencing Law and Policy] Distinguishing finality interests between convictions and sentences [Sentencing Law and Policy] Earlier: Sentencing Law Smackdown: Berman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:14 am
United States [Volokh Conspiracy] Carrington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 11:12 am
A lot of people have talked about the Supreme Court's small docket; Judge Harry Pregerson of the Ninth Circuit is actually doing something about it. [read post]