Search for: "Carroll v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
Because district courts have "exclusive jurisdiction" over certain trust actions, judgments rendered by other trial courts are void Johnny Carroll, Individually and as Trustee of the Johnny Carroll Trust v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court decision Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
United States Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Congress has stated that encouraging independent living for people with disabilities is the policy of the United States government. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
(Lozano v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:33 pm
” United Nat. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
EJI notes that yesterday’s order list also included an order sending back Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case to the state court “for further review in light of the Court’s recent decision in Moore v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
” Carroll v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Jean Carroll v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 3:37 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh District came to the same conclusion in Carello v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
As if to calm the itchy fingers of a million Twitter pundits, the brief emphasizes that “[t]he United States does not express any view regarding the potential criminal liability of any person for the events of January 6, 2021, or acts connected with those events. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
