Search for: "Carter v. Carter" Results 21 - 40 of 2,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 9:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Lead exposure — Medical testimony Kevin Carter, appellant, sued TAL Associates, appellee, alleging that he had sustained permanent injury caused by his exposure to lead paint while frequently visiting a home located at 103 E. 22nd Street in Baltimore City (“the Subject Property”) when he was a young child. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Surreptitious audio recording Following trial in the Circuit Court for Alleghany County, a jury found Christopher Ian Carter, appellant, guilty of possession of a controlled dangerous substance, and distribution of a controlled dangerous substance. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm by Daily Record Staff
  In this appeal, Natasha Carter, appellant, challenges her conviction for constructive criminal contempt in the Circuit Court for Somerset County. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:30 am by sally
Regina v Carter (David) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division “If a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage in the trial, the judge was not required to direct the remaining members of the jury to ignore any views expressed by the juror who had departed. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Carter challenges the court’s denial of his motion for default judgment and granting of appellees’ ... [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:56 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Today and yesterday, the British Columbia Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Carter v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Regina v Horncastle; Regina v Blackmore; Regina v Marquis; Regina v Graham; Regina v Carter Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A criminal trial could be fair although the defence did not have the opportunity of examining every prosecution witness. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 am
R v Horncastle and another; R v Marquis and another; R v Carter [2009] EWCA Crim 964; [2009] WLR (D) 173 “There would be no breach of art 6, and in particular art 6(3)(d), of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, if a criminal conviction were based solely or to [...] [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:36 am by SHG
Marco’s response was Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:42 am by MBettman
On January 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Dennis Carter v. [read post]