Search for: "Carter v. Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Tigar, Research Professor of Law, American University Washington College of LawThe Role and Responsibility of Prosecutors4:15-5:30 p.m.Moderator: Thomas Metzloff, Professor of Law, Duke University School of LawPanelists:--R. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 9:04 am
Three Supreme Court / IP veterans are handling the oral arguments: Maureen Mahoney (Quanta); Thomas Hungar (DOJ); Carter Phillips (LGE, patentee). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Carter, 682 S.E.2d 416 (N.C.App. 2009); Hathaway v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
LAMPMAN; from Bosque County; 10th district (10-06-00096-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-08-07)[Concurrence in 10-06-00096-CV]07-1038 ALINDA FRANCINE CARTER-THOMAS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
”Kristin Ahlberg, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “The Foreign Relation Series and Human Rights: Documenting the Carter Administration"Carl Ashley, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Declassifying the History of U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Carter, The Culture of Arbitration and the Defence of Arbitral Legitimacy Stephan W. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Jess Bravin reports on remarks by retired Justice John Paul Stevens on the effect that the decision by conservative Judge Jeffrey Sutton, who wrote an opinion rejecting a facial challenge to the Affordable Care Act in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Lloyd Cutler, White House Counsel to Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, has written in the "Washington Post" that Senate Rule Twenty-Two is plainly unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  (See also Thomas Merrill's fine study, although I saw nothing to support his speculation about John Dickinson's influence on the Court after Crowell v. [read post]