Search for: "Carter v. Thomas" Results 101 - 120 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm by Marin
A comprehensive 1986 federal immigration law made an exception for licensing laws like the Arizona statute, she said.Justice Scalia, backed up in spirit by mute wingman Thomas, appeared to defend the law during arguments. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
Carter In my opinion, this is a list of books one might recommend to someone thinking of becoming a lawyer, not a list for lawyers. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm by Sandy Levinson
If Clarence Thomas should have been denied confirmation because of suspicions that he commimtted perjury when he denied ever having a conversation about Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
 Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those entities were represented by Washington, D.C., lawyer Carter G. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:10 am by Lyle Denniston
Goldstein’s approach, indeed, allowed his principal adversary, Washington lawyer Carter G. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am by Joel Goldstein
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Reflections on African-American/Immigrant Relations Andrew Grant-Thomas, Yusuf Sarfati & Cheryl Staats Transportation and Civil Rights: Thomas W. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In a column for Bloomberg View, Stephen Carter speculates on why the Supreme Court appears to be “all but leak-proof. [read post]