Search for: "Carver v. Jackson" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 10:15 pm by Simon Gibbs
A recent comment on a LinkedIn discussion forum raised the issue of whether the proposed changes to the Part 36 rules and the formal reversal of Carver v BAA were sensible. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
Look at the recent suffocation of Carver v BAA Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412 in the L G Blower Ltd v Reeves [2010] EWCA Civ 726 decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:55 am by Simon Gibbs
  One example given of this is the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in L G Blower Ltd v Reeves (reported within Gibbon v Manchester City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 726) which recognises that although the case of Carver v v BAA Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412, concerning beating Part 36 offers by a narrow margin, is binding on them, for all practical purposes it can generally be ignored. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:19 am by Simon Gibbs
– The formal reversal of Carver v BAA. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:45 am by John McFarland
” The origin of the doctrine and of the phrase “privies in blood, privies in estate, and privies in law” comes from Carver v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
Michael Jackson – Gravity defying shoes In 1993, singer and entertainer Michael Jackson received a patent on a novel shoe, The shoe includes a cut-out in the heel, which an entertainer slides on and off a nail head in the stage. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
These included: Chris Bryant (MP); Sadie Frost; HJK; Gavin Henson; Ben Jackson; Jude Law; Denis MacShane; Ciara Parkes; Guy Pelly; John Prescott; Tom Rowland; Christopher Shipman; and Joan Smith. [read post]