Search for: "Case v. Brown" Results 121 - 140 of 10,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 4:47 am
Here's the abstract:The most watched case of the 1952 Supreme Court Term was not Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:24 pm
Last Friday, we filed an amicus brief supporting the respondent in Uttecht v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Today we revisit the case of the day from April 5, 2011, Tamimi Global Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:47 am by ipandentertainmentlaw
Bennett UPDATE:  The parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement and the case was dismissed on August 4, 2009. posted February 24, 2008 The court in Browne v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Much of the Supreme Court’s moral capital rests on two Warren Court decisions, Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 11:06 am by Nonprofit Blogger
The case arose out of a dispute involving the Estate of James Brown, his alleged spouse, and several of his... [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:30 am by Unknown
Casey was at least as strong as the case for reversing Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:19 pm
Here is NPR's talk show on the subject, in which yours truly claims that the decision is the greatest civil rights case since Brown v Board.... [read post]
8 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Maryland Insurance Administration — Case caption Richard Afolabi-Brown, appellant, filed a complaint with the Maryland Insurance Administration’s Policy and Casualty Unit (P&C Unit) alleging that Allstate Insurance Company, appellee, had failed to fully pay his claim for water damage to his home and had improperly increased his homeowner’s insurance premium because of ... [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:33 am
Filed: March 29, 2007--Opinion by Judge Sally AdkinsIn a case arising from disputed use of a right-of-way, the Court of Special Appeals examined the nature of a nominal damages award, and whether there is a maximum limitation on the dollar amount that can be considered nominal damages.Appellants, the Browns, were determined by the lower court to have been trespassing on property owned by the Smiths, by traveling over a farm lane to access a public road from the… [read post]