Search for: "Cash v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by Shane Smith
In Pennsylvania, actual cash value has consistently been interpreted to mean repair or replacement costs less depreciation.1 In Gilderman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Texas Supreme Court justices will entertain oral argument on the issue when they convene out of town -- in Houston -- tomorrow.The case is styled Hiawatha Henry, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 5:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is discussed in the 1968, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Superior Pontiac Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
It is against this background that we assess whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court unreasonably applied clearly established federal law. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
As the Manitoba Court of Appeal put it in its 1993 decision Provincial Drywall Supply Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  In a similar case against State Farm, a California Superior Court judge has now certified a class. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:15 pm by Shane Smith
Truck Insurance Exchange,1 where an appeal was recently filed at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on this question: Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a... [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Superior Court recently dismissed Jarden LLC’s bid for D&O insurance coverage for an appraisal suit that was not “for” redress of a “wrongful act” – and even if it was, the act couldn’t have occurred before the sale to Jewel Rubbermaid Inc. closed, ending the coverage period, in Jarden LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 12:35 pm
In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Leah Sears, from an appeal of an order entered in the Superior Court of Bryan County by Judge David Cavender, in Blige v. [read post]
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]