Search for: "Cash v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm by John Taylor
That would strain the resources of the superior courts, which are not equipped to handle large numbers of cash deposits. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:35 pm
However, on November 29, 2007 the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appelate Division reversed the decision of the lower court, stating: "It is clear from the record that the terms of the agreement called for the payment to be made in a lump sum, not in a structure. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decided Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]