Search for: "Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners (Offshore) Ltd." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Examples of other cases granting injunctions to restrain dilution or elimination of equity interests and associated rights outside of the cash-out merger context include the following: Spivak v Bertrand, 147 AD3d 650 [1st Dept 2017] [“Without the preliminary injunction, plaintiff will be irreparably harmed, since his shares . . . will be automatically transferred . . . and he will be stripped of his voting power and decision-making rights”]; Datwani… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
An opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of power and wrest complete control over the company can constitute irreparable injury (see Vanderminden v Vanderminden, 226 AD2d 1037, 1041 [1996]; Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners [Offshore] Ltd., 17 Misc 3d 1137A, *8 [2007]; see also Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 AD2d 363, 366 [1985]). [read post]