Search for: "Castell v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
By the time this Kat got down to reading the decision of the Sixth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union in Case T‑320/10 Fürstlich Castell’sches Domänenamt Albrecht Fürst Zu Castell-Castell v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks And Designs) (OHIM), Castel Frères Sas, dating back to 13 September last, it was no longer topical and he decided not to write it up. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:29 am
Judge Castel agreed with Judge Oetken’s analysis in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:55 pm
Board of Elections of New York, United States District Judge P. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:43 pm
Cite: Mata v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
The case before Judge Castel involved the same news gathering icon and was styled Associated Press v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 10:23 pm
Kevin Castel ruled on August 5 in Casillas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 1:13 pm
This mental state of agreeing to the offense of conspiracy is distinct too from the substantive crimes under conspiracy (Pinkerton).Castel argues there was no plain error. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 9:50 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Lilia Castel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
Siragusa (W.D.N.Y.), in Ravenwood v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 7:01 pm
From today's decision in Nunes v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm
The Supreme Court has already announced it will take up the boundaries of Section 230 immunity this term in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 12:24 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In Mata v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
She took her grievances public and spoke out before the State Assembly. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 8:48 am
A judge in New York City declines to do, and the law remains on the books.The case is Silberberg v. [read post]
