Search for: "Castell v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2024, 8:26 am
This is because the purpose of invalidity proceedings based on absolute grounds for invalidity is to “enable EUIPO to review the validity of the registration of a mark and to adopt, where necessary, a position which it should have adopted of its own motion” [citing Castel Frères v OHIM, C-622/13 P, para 42]. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
From an order this Monday by Judge Kevin Castel (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Kevin Castel, U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In Mata v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:50 pm
"] From today's decision in Fairstein v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Judge Castel pointed out that “[Varghese v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:43 pm
Cite: Mata v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
"] A month ago, I wrote about Judge Kevin Castel (S.D.N.Y.)'s May 4 order in Mata v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] A Lawyer's Filing "Is Replete with Citations to Non-Existent Cases"—Thanks, ChatGPT?
26 May 2023, 10:46 pm
From Judge Kevin Castel (S.D.N.Y.)'s May 4 order in Mata v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
Pere Arque-Castells (University of Groningen), Dr. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
Source: Baron, J., Arque-Castells, P., Leonard, A., et al., Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in SEP Licensing, European Commission, DG GROW, 2023. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am
As to preliminary references, there were three rulings in 2022 concerning trademarks and one on designs (C-421/20, Acacia v BMW). [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 7:01 pm
From today's decision in Nunes v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm
The Supreme Court has already announced it will take up the boundaries of Section 230 immunity this term in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
Indeed, the Court reiterated its principle from Castells v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
District Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District Court of New York issued an injunction against Telegram Group Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:29 am
Judge Castel agreed with Judge Oetken’s analysis in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 1:13 pm
This mental state of agreeing to the offense of conspiracy is distinct too from the substantive crimes under conspiracy (Pinkerton).Castel argues there was no plain error. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
