Search for: "Castle v. Castle"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 2:32 pm
Castle v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:47 am
Ohio's 1st District Court of Appeals here in Cincinnati on Jan. 30th. declined to extend the state's castle doctrine statute – that states you have no duty to retreat to defend your home or vehicle, or "castle" – to include a car not owned by the defendant. [ State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:49 am
Take State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
Attorneys for White Castle patron, Martin Kessman, have filed a Complaint in the Southern District of New York against White Castle concerning alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) concerning lack of seating to accomodate large inviduals, i.e., 6 foot and 290 pound frame. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
” This past summer, in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:58 am
White Castle" [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Last week’s decision by the 8th District in State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm
(14) Regulating fast food (4) Pelman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
Lewis, and the 5th District’s decision earlier this year in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Kylie Rhoton, False Promises of Protection: Town of Castle Rock v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
I've just done an article for a blog I write for a firm of solicitors on the revised judgment of the Court of Appeal in Simmons v Castle. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:29 am
In Mapp v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Castle Megastore Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:34 am
Case citation: Castle v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:48 am
Castle, 168 Ohio Misc.2d 6, 2012-Ohio-1937 On July 3, 2011, Floyd Castle was arrested and charged with OVI (drunk driving) and other offenses. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
Castle Harbour v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
Harris v Perry and another [2008] EWCA Civ 907; [2008] WLR (D) 278 “It was not reasonably foreseeable that boisterous play on a bouncy castle would involve a significant risk of serious harm and, therefore, parents who hired a bouncy castle for a children's party did not have a duty of care to keep the children playing on it under uninterrupted supervision. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
Castle Rock v. [read post]
