Search for: "Castro v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:01 pm by Tatiana Venn
” We received these documents in response to the January 24, 2018, lawsuit we filed after the Department of Justice failed to respond to a December 4, 2017, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am by fvanloon
Relative to GDP, OSFs spend more than twice as much in grant and program funding in Guatemala than in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joaquin Castro Tweeted the Names of Top Trump Donors. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Jessica Zhang, Andrew Patterson
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reason this resonates is because it has been a trope appropriated in quite related and distinct ways by 20th century leaders (Fidel Castro Speech to Intellectuals 1961 ("This means that within the Revolution, everything goes; against the Revolution, nothing. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
  Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]