Search for: "Castro v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
FEDERAL CASES The United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the conflict between the Confrontation Clause and other rights and privileges are Crawford v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:23 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
v=etXYIozoACw   The United States Supreme Court’s Decision on Non-exempt Employee’s Work Day This past Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Otah requested a bond hearing while he awaited removal from the United States and while his Petition for Review (PFR) was pending with the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
  See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:50 am
We simply think that the rights of ten million vehicle owners and lessees across the United States should not be adjudicated in an action brought by three plaintiffs who cannot show more than the merest possibility of injury to themselves. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:39 pm
In this short essay I will try to convince the reader that Fidel Castro of Cuba, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and Evo Morales of Nicaragua, the current public standard bearers of fight against the current norms of economic globalization in general, and its systems of financial capital in particular, will be good for business—that is good for the business of modern so-called neo liberal global capital markets in general, and for the business of lending to sovereigns, in… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925), the rationale for the border search exception is that the United States – like other sovereign countries – is entitled to stop travelers at the border and search them and their belongings to ensure that contraband is not being brought into or taken out of the country.    [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]