Search for: "Castro v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
United StatesVazzo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
From Castro v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro Tweeted the Names of Top Trump Donors. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
when undertaken by other states. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am
In Castro v Renteria, 2019 WL 1761546 (D. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
In Castro v Hernandez Renteria, 2018 WL 7680608 (D. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reason this resonates is because it has been a trope appropriated in quite related and distinct ways by 20th century leaders (Fidel Castro Speech to Intellectuals 1961 ("This means that within the Revolution, everything goes; against the Revolution, nothing. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Joaquin Castro (D. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:10 am
But see United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
