Search for: "Catenacci v. State"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:35 am
Intrusion upon seclusion claim: The court referred to Jones v Tsige and stated that the tort required intentional intrusion upon the seclusion of another of his private affairs. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Rodgers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
Written with Christina Catenacci LL.B. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
This post was written with assistance from Christina Catenacci, LL.B. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal case of Perera v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
In Horner v Peelle Company Ltd, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal concluded that the employer’s actions breached the Ontario Human Rights Code. [read post]
