Search for: "Cates v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: Cate v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:23 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 12:25 pm
Relatively harsh words from the Ninth Circuit this morning.The majority -- Judge Wardlaw, joined by Judge Silverman -- believe that there was a plea deal (and that the state breached it). [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:22 pm
  And reviewed some of the -- get this -- over 250 published opinions in California state and federal court which mention that, yeah, it's definitely a derogatory term. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Then don't read this case.The California Gambling Control Commission is responsible, inter alia, for collecting revenue from the various Indian tribes that maintain casinos in the state. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am by Federalist Society
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certifi­cates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national ex­change), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am by Federalist Society
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certifi­cates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national ex­change), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal, Tony Mauro talks to appellate lawyer Cate Stetson about why so few women argue at the Supreme Court. [read post]