Search for: "Cates v. State"
Results 101 - 104
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
Each statement must either: (i) agree to the change of inventorship; or (ii) state that the person has no disagreement regarding the requested change. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:06 am
Page 2 cating that they are very satisfied, accompanied by an increase in dissatisfaction. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The judge concluded that the Respondent's witnesses' stated reasons for discharging Moran were inconsistent and, therefore, pretextual. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
" Chairman Battista and Member Schaumber, with Member Walsh dissenting in part, reversed the judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by the statements about striker replacement made by Supervisor Johnson on Aug. 5, 2000; by Rojas' Oct. 1 statement that all unions do is take employees' money; by Respondent's CEO Walter Beck's alleged solicitation of grievances at an Oct. 1 employee meeting; by Rojas' Oct. 1 alleged threats of job loss,… [read post]
