Search for: "Cato v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
In Devillier v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Today The Hill published my article on Texas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Examples include: Evidence of the original meaning of the Contracts Clause and ways it might be reinvigorated through litigation Potential theories under the Citizenship Clause State constitutional anti‐monopoly and anti‐gift provisions and other causes of action unique to state law or state constitutions The Ninth Amendment Questions left open by North Carolina Dental Board and ways in which parties can use the Sherman Act to hold… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm
New Vik Amar piece, forthcoming in the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court Moore v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
It is long established and ordinarily uncontroversial that speech can lose the protection of the First Amendment if, for example, it seeks to intimidate a public official into shirking a legal duty, or if it consists of the submission of forged documents to a government agency, or if it solicits or facilitates crime generally (this past term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Earlier today, I submitted an amicus brief to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Magliocca's Prawfsblawg post focuses on the Supreme Court's 1947 decision in Kotch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
In this regard, Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
(Cato, Eugene, and I first made this argument a decade ago in an amicus brief supporting certiorari in Elane Photograhy LLC v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules that law criminalizing encouragement of illegal immigration is constitutional
24 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
” [Quoting United States v. [read post]
