Search for: "Cavanagh v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
A Canada Revenue Agency employee’s moonlighting activities constituted a serious conflict of interest and, along with his subsequent insubordination, gave the employer sufficient cause to terminate the employee, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board recently confirmed in Cavanagh v Canada Revenue Agency. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:31 am
Concerning disciplinary action in situations where a disability may be a considerationMatter of Schlitz v Cavanagh, 14 Misc.3d 1213 The significant issue in the Schlitz case concerned the interplay of two different provisions of the Civil Service Law: serving disciplinary charges against an individual pursuant to Section 75 and Section 72, which is triggered, in cases of an employee’s inability to perform the duties of the position because of non-work related disease or… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:48 am
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued one order appointing the State Appellate Defender Office to represent the defendant in People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
(Read the opinion and our blog post of August 7, 2008, on City of Long Branch v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
On July 13, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Justice Corrigan’s majority opinion in Holman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
From Wade v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:23 am
Brewer v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 12:19 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
” Justice Cavanagh dissented and would grant reconsideration for the reasons stated in his dissent in the original opinion. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
” In Jones v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:06 pm
In Woodman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:40 am
Wainwright and Strickland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court decisions based on the definition of acquittal set forth in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
Justice Cavanagh concurred with the majority but wrote separately to respond to Justice Young’s dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:53 am
So held the Michigan Supreme Court in Pellegrino v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
In McCormick v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:35 am
The case is better known as the Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:16 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co, No. 142754 (Justices Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly, and Hathaway would leave); DuRall v. [read post]
