Search for: "Central Bank v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 10:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Superior Court affirmed, the Property owners appealed, and the Superior Court, Appellate Division, reversed. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:49 am by John Jascob
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco asked the Court to address whether the PSLRA stays discovery in Securities Act cases brought in state court, or only those brought in federal court. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
District Court for the Central District of California, who explained that corporations could not be sued under the current understanding of the ATS. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Then, on June 6, Abou-Haidar withdrew his Superior Court answer and counterclaim and instead sought assistance from the French Central Authority. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:40 pm
Reviczky.The broad issue before the court was whether the bank's charge was defeasible or indefeasible, pursuant to the Land Titles Act R.S.O. 1990 c.L.5Relying on the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Paul’s Parish in Visalia, California, in Tulare County Superior Court (2010); St. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Andrew’s in Syracuse, NY; Diocese of Central New York, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, even though the plaintiff is a Mississippi pension fund and the defendant is a New York investment bank, the plaintiff filed lawsuit in Orange County, California, superior court. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Guilford County Superior Court entered a Permanent Custody Order granting Respondent sole custody on July 1, 2015. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
Johnson Opinion appears to be dicta and should only be considered to be more in the form of an advisory opinion by the Superior Court on the scope and reach of the Fair Share Act given that one judge on the Superior Court panel sat out of the decision. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) remains viable law post-AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]