Search for: "Certilman v. Becker" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiff’s action may be premature because, while the underlying action is pending, it cannot be determined whether the defendant’s alleged legal malpractice proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain damages (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 542-543; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1006; Stein Indus., Inc. v… [read post]