Search for: "Cetacean Community v. Bush" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 10:02 am by Audrey A Millemann
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has addressed this question in The Cetacean Community v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm by Michael Froomkin
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that".The minutes for the hearing further clarify this: "The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
The Naruto panel wasn’t at all happy about this, but said it was bound by the earlier decision in Cetacean Community v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  It's pretty rare for judges to change their minds based on the oral argument, so the final decision generally ends up being in line with the tentative decision, often with some adjustments and corrections based on what is said at the argument.The tentative decision, in its entirety, is:The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Kevin
There is no written order yet, but the minute order for the hearing says this: The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:08 am by David Post
The court declared that it was bound by a prior Ninth Circuit case on the question - Cetacean Community v Bush, 386 F.3d 1169 (2004) - though it pointedly noted that it emphatically disagreed with the conclusion of the earlier case that non-humans can satisfy constitutional standing requirements, and it called on the entire court to reconsider en banc, and to overturn, the earlier holding. [read post]