Search for: "Cetacean Community v. Bush"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 11:58 am
Cal. 2012) Cetacean Community v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:58 am
Cal. 2012) Cetacean Community v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
., Cetacean Community v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:11 am
, Cetacean [Community v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 8:40 pm
" Cetacean Cmty. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:53 am
Sup.); see also, Cetacean Community v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:02 am
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has addressed this question in The Cetacean Community v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm
In Naruto v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:08 am
The court declared that it was bound by a prior Ninth Circuit case on the question - Cetacean Community v Bush, 386 F.3d 1169 (2004) - though it pointedly noted that it emphatically disagreed with the conclusion of the earlier case that non-humans can satisfy constitutional standing requirements, and it called on the entire court to reconsider en banc, and to overturn, the earlier holding. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:30 am
The Naruto panel wasn’t at all happy about this, but said it was bound by the earlier decision in Cetacean Community v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Under the holding in Cetacean Community v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that".The minutes for the hearing further clarify this: "The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:51 pm
It's pretty rare for judges to change their minds based on the oral argument, so the final decision generally ends up being in line with the tentative decision, often with some adjustments and corrections based on what is said at the argument.The tentative decision, in its entirety, is:The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:48 am
There is no written order yet, but the minute order for the hearing says this: The Court announces the tentative opinion, in line with the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Cetacean Community v Bush, that while Congress and the President can extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:44 am
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:20 am
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:20 pm
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
