Search for: "Chaires v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 2,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 8:34 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
• An inside look at the recently launched state cold case unit for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and People. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The UK Cabinet Office is to hand over Whatsapp messages concerning the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic to the public inquiry, following the High Court’s rejection of their challenge, Cabinet Office v Chair of Covid Inquiry [2023] EWHC 1702 (Admin). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
  FTC Chair Khan and Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter have the necessary drive. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am by Antonio Dempsey
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently made a significant decision regarding the certification procedure for collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
United States And The Original Meaning Of Income (June 27, 2023) Christopher Cox (Former Rep. (1989-2005) & SEC Chair (2005-2009)) & Hank Adler (Chapman), The Ninth Circuit Upholds A Wealth Tax (Jan. 30, 2023) Reuven... [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]