Search for: "Chaker v. Chaker" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Chaker https://t.co/t7pYj4EQJ4 -> Major case on enforcement of arbitration clauses Microsoft Mobile OY (Ltd) v Sony Europe Ltd & Ors [2017] EWHC 374 https://t.co/XG7DT39lx2 -> Common law copyright in name rejected, again Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v McDougald, 2017 ABQB 124 https://t.co/JkEggI59kS -> Planning for cyberbreaches https://t.co/uVTQrnbhZD -> Museums, Copyright and Licensing: Museums both Licensors and Licensees https://t.co/G9UV4AkgFa… [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
Compass Restaurant * Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Talk Slides on Section 230, Anti-SLAPP Laws and Housing Anti-Discrimination Two More Cases Hold That Anti-SLAPP Laws Protect Consumer Reviews Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Morel Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/rOc8oWFoPS -> 4th judgment for counterfeiting shows that court awards are too lenient Lam v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Anders Another Questionable IP Lawsuit Over a Derogatory Twitter Account Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Amazon. com, Inc., 834 F. 3d 220 (2nd.Cir.2016) Norcia v Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 845 F.3d 1279 (9th.Cir.2017) McMillan v Chaker 2017 WL 1336941 (S.D.Cal. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:02 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Morel Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
ComplaintsBoard Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]