Search for: "Chamberlain v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent Eligibility: The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:41 am by Venkat
Katzer (an open source case involving model train sets) and The Chamberlain Group v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm by Medicare Set Aside Services
JOE AND BARBARA CHAMBERLAIN, ETAL., DEFENDANTSCIVIL ACTION NO. 10-144-DLBUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, NORTHERN DIVISION2010 U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:30 am by Jon Robinson
”  The Eleventh Circuit begrudgingly stated that it was bound by prior precedent, Richardson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even if the plaintiff had sufficiently pleaded this allegation, she “failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that the[ ] defendants intended to deceive the court” or the plaintiff (Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912; see Ticketmaster Corp. v Lidsky, 245 AD2d 142, 143; Thomas v Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, 115 AD2d 999, 999-1000). [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:28 am
Interestingly enough, however, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently addressed this issue as it arose under the Unemployment Compensation Law, in the matter of Chamberlain v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Notably, “ '[a]ssertion of unfounded allegations in a pleading, even if made for improper purposes, does not provide a basis for liability under [Judiciary Law § 487]’ ” (Ticketmaster Corp. v Lidsky, 245 AD2d 142, 143 [1997], quoting Thomas v Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, 115 AD2d 999, 999-1000 [1985]). [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]