Search for: "Chamberlain v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 26 January 2022 there was a directions hearing in the case of HM Attorney-General v BBC before Chamberlain J. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
No. 337-TA-690 in Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Components Thereof brought by Ricoh against Oki Data (ITC 337 Update) (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Chamberlain Group – Failure to timely disclose third party witness contacts prevents testimony: Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others, heard 4 to 8 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC)… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming summary judgment, the court ruled that while the statute at issue referred to a “just, humane and efficient corrections program,” these words were too general to create a substantial public policy exception sufficient to support a cause of action for retaliatory discharge (Chamberlain v Wexford Health Sources, Inc, November 8, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:32 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
  For example, the court in The Chamberlain Group LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2023 there was a statement in open court in the case of Paul and Clare Wylie v Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited before Chamberlain J. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Chamberlain Professor of Legislation, Columbia Law School Jeremy Creelan, Partner, Jenner & Block, LLP, former Deputy Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The Editors Code of Practice, which is enforced by IPSO, states that corrections must be published “with due prominence. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am by Margaret Wood
  This doctrine was established in the 1920 United States Supreme Court case Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 26 April 2022 Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of HM Attorney-General v BBC. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Minister of State for Media, Data and Digital Infrastructure has also announced an Online Advertising Programme will review regulatory frameworks of paid digital advertising. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor [2018] UKSC 51 It is not every day you see the Supreme Court setting HMO licence conditions, but today is that day. [read post]