Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 5,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
In an opinion that brings labor laws in a dozen states into question, the Supreme Court ruled on June 19 in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am by sally
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:03 am by constitutional lawblogger
The super-size soda ban, a program advocated by NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is not constitutional according to the unanimous opinion from a state appellate court in New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Earlier this month, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down judgment in Mouvement Raelien Suisse v Switzerland (Application no.16354/06). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
The decision, Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm by immigrationprof
From the National Immigration Law Center: In the wake of last year’s disappointing Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]