Search for: "Chance v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2013, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
On remand from the California Supreme Court, a superior court judge  certified a meal period subclass in a long-running class action wage suit against Brinker Restaurant Corp (Hohnbaum v Brinker Restaurant Corp, September 26, 2013, Dato, W). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
Another possibility is that either Kagan or one of her superiors in the Obama Administration secretly disagrees with the Supreme Court's most expansive Commerce Clause precedents, such as Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Lyne Duhaime
The Superior Court of Quebec recently went further. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Second Chance Body Armor, et al., No. 04-0280 (D.D.C.), setting forth the DOJ’s official position on the impact of the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision announced last week in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Mar. 11, 2020), the Appellate Division of the Yolo County Superior Court reversed an unlawful detainer judgment. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc., No. 18-999 (same); Superior Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:40 am by Sabrina Serino
A copy of the full decision can be found here: Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v. [read post]