Search for: "Chandler v. Lord" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
In an earlier post, we had discussed the judgment of the England & Wales High Court in Chandler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
The injunction was designed to protect the safety of the Chandlers” The injunction prevented reporting until the Chandlers were both in the custody of Foreign Office officials and outside Somalia. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Lord Justice Leveson warned the press that he would be monitoring coverage for adverse coverage of Inquiry witnesses. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Lord Justice Leveson has heard his final witness of the year; the Parliamentary recess has begun; the Royal Courts of Justice is having its Christmas break. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 6 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of Chandler v O’Connor. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 On 17 May 2018 there was a statement in open court in the case of Chandler v Another Europe is Possible Limited. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Will Korn
Former Houston Volunteer Lawyers Executive Director Anne Chandler and HVL Chair David E. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The case of Chandler v O’Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB) concerned allegations of money laundering and covertly using connections with Russia to lobby for a ‘hard’ Brexit. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am by CMS
In reaching its decision, the High Court applied the principles stipulated by Arden LJ in Chandler v Cape Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525 regarding the circumstances in which a parent company could incur liability in negligence to third parties arising out of the operations of its subsidiary. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
First of all, Lord Justice Simon, who delivered a leading judgement, confirmed that absence of the reported cases on the breach of duty of care by the parent company owed to the persons affected by its subsidiary’s operations does not automatically render such a claim unarguable. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
Mr Justice Lightman gave an answer to that question in 1999 in Victor Chandler International v HM Customs and Excise:“In summary, a document is a material object which contains information capable of extraction from it (e.g. a tape so long as it is not blank). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by INFORRM
  The defence failed in Hunter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm by Xandra Kramer
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
See, 04680-18 Cosentino v Thurrock Independent. 01735-18 Chandler v The New European, provisions 1 (accuracy), breach with the sanction of a correction by the publication 02176-18 Chandler v Mail on Sunday, provision 1, breach after investigation 04419-18 Muslim Council of Britain v The Times, provision 1, no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 04791-18 Legatum Institute Foundation v The Times, provision 1, resolved directly… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 November 2019 Nicklin J heard the assessment of damages in the case of Chandler v O’Connor. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
Lord Templeman referred to the principle in Salomon v Salomon & co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, as the ‘unyielding rock’ on which company law is constructed. [read post]