Search for: "Channell v. Anthony" Results 81 - 100 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  However, the three dissenters from the Hill decision — Justices Anthony M. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney) Plaintiffs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:37 am by Ella Brodskaya
After seven consecutive wins in a row, the crowd chanting M-V-P, and a shot at the playoffs, fans worldwide have become part of the frenzy dubbed “Linsanity. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Writing for ACSblog, Anthony Renzo criticizes the Court’s decision in Minneci v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Quite early in Tuesday’s argument, it was Justice Anthony M. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm by Keith Gerver
  Kammen states that it was raised through informal channels. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Tejinder Singh
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]