Search for: "Channing v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Paul Chan Mo-Po and another [2017] HKCA 149; CACV 252/2015). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
The district court order stated that “the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation”; Levy’s post states that Ruddie is in the final stages of plea bargaining with the United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island; we understand that his obligations will extend to getting phony consent orders lifted in two dozen other cases besides those involving Myvesta. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  As discussed in a prior blog post, the Supreme Court of the United States is currently considering several petitions for certiorari regarding the issue. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Paul Chan and his wife, Frieda Hui, were found to have defamed Carl Lu and his two children in 2011. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
If so, then the court lacks jurisdiction, because there is no diversity jurisdiction where one of the parties is a US citizen with a foreign domicile (since such a person is not an alien and is not a citizen of any state of the United States for the relevant purposes). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Eugene Volokh
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Jim Singer
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Jim Singer
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:15 pm by Immigration Prof
Cesar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández’s CrImmigration.com blog recently posted a helpful analysis of United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment, Daniel Hemel discusses United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
John Bryan, who once dated Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, has launched a legal action against News Corporation in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Supreme Court opinion in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]