Search for: "Chapman v. California" Results 1 - 20 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 1:54 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Since then, many California clinicians have exclaimed how that decision will have catastrophic effects on care and treatment. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:22 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: Half a century ago, in Chapman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:37 am
California or the 'substantial and injurious effect' standard of Brecht v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:35 am by Conor McEvily
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: United States and California v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:53 pm by Curt Cutting
In this unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) affirms punitive damages totaling $625,000 against three defendants in a real estate fraud action. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:01 am
This is why so many attorneys who file ADA claims in California use professional plaintiffs. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Aurora Barnes
Florida and none of the findings required by Hurst were made, the error can be deemed harmless under Chapman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 2:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
In June 2015, the Alameda Superior Court issued an Order striking down much of California Health & Safety Code 1418.8. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
"  Id. at 1055, 1056 (citing In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298, 326 (2009); Chapman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am by Ezra Rosser
-v.-17-2022-.pdf The volume is edited by the remarkable Selma Moidel Smith, who at 103 years old is at long last retiring from her editorship of the journal. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:25 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
This webinar will explain the implications of the case, California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. [read post]