Search for: "Chapman v. King*" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
For instance, Chapman law professor Ronald Rotunda has a new paper discussing King v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Joe Patrice
Viewed in light of the details of the Anna Chapman ring, I think maybe Russia should just give up trying to spy. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by NL
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am by John Eastman
As it noted all the way back in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68.   [read post]