Search for: "Charles L. Black, Jr." Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am by Alfred Brophy
Purcell Jr., Some Horwitzian Themes in the Law and History of the Federal Courts 17 Barbara Aronstein Black, Some Contract History: About Samuel Williston 18 Constance Backhouse, Anti-Semitism and the Law in Québec City: The Plamondon Case, 1910-15 19 Katherine V. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Recently published sports law scholarship includes:Jessica L. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Green Jr., Same-Sex Sex and Immutable Traits: Why Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
[ Another important formulation was provided by Charles Reich in his 1963 article, Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:36 am by Jane Chong, Benjamin Wittes
As Charles Black, Jr., explains in his classic 1974 handbook on the subject, some acts are not crimes but are sufficiently abusive or ignominious to render an individual unfit for the nation's highest office. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:01 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Johnson, Charles Evans Hughes, McGeorge Bundy, and Hugo Black, and seven years' worth of Frankfurter's diaries. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm by Nate Russell
Int’l L. 29, by professor Susan Tiefenbrun of the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, attributes the term’s coming to relevance to a 2001 essay by Major General Charles J. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
• Frederick Eugene Black, 58, of League City, died August 26, 2020. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
• Frederick Eugene Black, 58, of League City, died August 26, 2020. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am by Dennis Crouch
  And in The Lost Precedent of the Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents, I review every published case finding or affirming non-infringement under the reverse doctrine of equivalents between 1898 and 1988, to conclude that the doctrine was regularly (even if not routinely) applied to find non-infringement in every decade from the 1900s through the 1980s, when the Federal Circuit effectively killed the doctrine.[16]  Of particular importance, opinions in the Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and… [read post]