Search for: "Charles Rothfeld" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The opinion is here; congratulations to my Mayer Brown LLP colleagues Stephen Shapiro, Timothy Bishop, Jeffrey Sarles, and Charles Rothfeld, and to Fish & Richardson’s Jonathan Singer, John Dragseth, and Deanna Reiche, all of whom represented the winning side, Mayo. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
  Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown in Washington will argue for the tanker company. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Congratulations to my Mayer Brown LLP colleagues Andy Pincus and Charles Rothfeld, who (through the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic project) had a cert grant this morning in Rehberg v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
  Counsel for the petitioner Texas water district, Charles Rothfeld, is an alum of the SG’s office, as is Lisa Blatt, counsel for the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:01 pm
Troubled by Rothfeld's contention, Justice Stephen Breyer noted that the father here appears to have "three Cherokee ancestors at the time of George Washington's father." [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Charles Rothfeld
Charles Rothfeld is special counsel at Mayer Brown. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here is also a suggestion, based on a suggestion offered to me by Charles Rothfeld: If either a court or a prominent repeat litigant before the court — the Solicitor General’s office — routinely uses “* * *,” it’s good to use that. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:08 am by Amy Howe
Arguing on behalf of the railroad, Charles Rothfeld billed the case as a “simple” one.  [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
Kannon Shanmugam of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the petitioner, and Charles Rothfeld of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:09 pm by Margaret Myers
Some suggested to Charles Rothfeld — the lawyer representing challengers to the laws — that requiring a breath test without a warrant might be allowed because it’s far less invasive than a blood test. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:56 am by Walter Olson
Zinke, a major ICWA lawsuit under way in Texas; and Charles Rothfeld, who represented the birth father in the important ICWA case Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing for the petitioner, Charles Rothfeld began with his textual arguments, which he would eventually reiterate in rebuttal.  [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm by Kate Fort
  Thus, the Chief Justice expressed some astonishment that “one drop of blood” could “trigger[] all these rights” under ICWA; both he and Justice Alito also tried to test the limits of the position taken by Charles Rothfeld, representing the Father, by asking him about a scenario in which the Tribe would allow virtually anyone to join the Tribe, regardless of whether the would-be members had any actual Indian ancestry. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Featured are three lawyers who have been involved in high-profile ICWA litigation, Timothy Sandefur of the Goldwater Institute, Matthew McGill of Gibson Dunn, and Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown and Yale Law School [details and registration; event not livestreamed, but video to be posted later] And now for something completely different: “Charles Evans Hughes and Chevron Deference” [Gerard Magliocca] Tags: administrative law, adoption, autos, Indian… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm by Amy Howe
If the Justices were worried that the government’s position would sweep too much conduct into the purview of Section 922(g), during the argument of Charles Rothfeld, representing respondent James Castleman, they seemed to have the opposite concern – that is, that Castleman’s position would result in conduct that Congress would have intended to fall under Section 922(g) being excluded. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am by Kristine Knaplund
Representing the Capatos, Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown LLP argued that, when Congress said “child” in 1939, the unambiguous meaning was the “biological child of married parents” since over ninety-five percent of children were born in wedlock, a position that drew considerable questioning from the bench.   [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Amy Howe
  And if that’s the case, he asked attorney Charles Rothfeld, representing the drivers, why can’t states decide to impose a criminal penalty instead? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Jill Family
Kinnaird appeared for Martinez Gutierrez, while Charles A. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Congratulates to my Mayer Brown LLP colleagues Charles Rothfeld and Joseph Minta, who represent the plaintiffs.) [read post]