Search for: "Charon QC"
Results 161 - 180
of 667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 2:10 am
” Podcast Charon QC, 21st April 2011 Source: www.charonqc.wordpress.com “Charon QC” is the blogging pseudonym of Mike Semple Piggot, editor of insitelaw newswire. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:36 am
However, it was not my fault...On Saturday evening I had a video chat on Skype with Charon QC. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Charon QC, (the alter ego of Mike Semple Piggot) a leading UK blawg, interviewed Emily Allbon in a recent entry. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm
Charon QC, David Allen Green and Carl Gardner have cast their third Without Prejudice Pod. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:54 am
” Podcast Charon QC, 14th April 2011 Source: www.charonqc.wordpress.com “Charon QC” is the blogging pseudonym of Mike Semple Piggot, editor of insitelaw newswire. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
The reason that I am writing this guest blog post is because of a recent podcast (by Charon QC) entitled, “Lawcast 181: Baroness Deech, Chair of The Bar Standards Board on legal education and the regulation of the profession” I really enjoyed this thought-provoking and interesting podcast, which I think is highly relevant to my arm of the profession too: the solicitors. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:35 am
Most noted for chairing the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), from 1994 to 2002, Lady Deech sits as a Crossbench peer in the House of Lords (since 2005) and, since 2009, Chair of The Bar Standards Board “ Podcast Charon QC, 8th April 2011 Source: www.charonqc.wordpress.com “Charon QC” is the blogging pseudonym of Mike Semple Piggot, editor of insitelaw newswire. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
" asked Charon QC and answered, "I have come to the conclusion that the 'point' is to provoke thought, comment and interest. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
" asked Charon QC and answered, "I have come to the conclusion that the 'point' is to provoke thought, comment and interest. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
All parodists, even amateurs like “Charon QC”, need good source material and inspiration – so I would not wish these denizens of the net to ‘cease and desist’. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
As far as I recall, I invented *Charon QC* (Choosing the ferryman because I rather liked the idea of driving lawyers to Hades) in 2002 and wrote qua Charon on a now defunct magazine I owned then. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
” Podcast Charon QC, 6th April 2011 Source: www.charonqc.wordpress.com “Charon QC” is the blogging pseudonym of Mike Semple Piggot, editor of insitelaw newswire. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:39 am
[No relation to Charon QC's post on BBC's Rough Justice] A long time ago in a land far, far away I reported that under the 2006 Cabinet Office “Transformational Government Strategy” at least 550 government websites would be closed, with only 26 certain to be retained (basically, I speculated, one [...] [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:11 am
Have a good week Charon [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Blawg Review #304—The "Spooked by Nukes" Edition ~~~ "A nuclear era, but I have no fear.... [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:29 am
A good starting point for this conversation is the legal bloggers, who generally speaking seek to bring the public closer to the legal system through modern technology, and have been predictably enthusiastic about Neuberger’s speech: see Meeja Law, UKSC Blog, Halsbury’s Law Exchange, Inforrm, ObiterJ, Charon QC and the UCL Constitutional Unit which called my own response “almost gushing“. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:22 pm
”, and Charon QC comments that the legal powers that be ‘roll their eyes heavenwards’ when he writes his blog, but he says “I do know they read it… if only to check that they are not in it”. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
" Charon QC, a UK law blog. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
" Charon QC, a UK law blog. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
As bloggers Anna Raccoon, Charon QC and Obiter J have reported, on a Parliamentary debate on Thursday the same Liberal Democrat MP, John Hemming, revealed the details of a number of other (what he called) “hyper” injunctions. [read post]
