Search for: "Chase v. Scott*"
Results 1 - 20
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
At 10 a.m. on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will again review the constitutional rules for high-speed police chases, in the case of Plumhoff v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:14 am
The decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:05 pm
Since the seminal case of Scott v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:31 am
In Plumhoff v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:44 am
In a case decided April 30, 2007, entitled Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
Here's a run-down of the opinions in Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 7:04 am
Harris (the car chase excessive force case) this morning. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:11 am
In Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
" Given the inherent dangerousness of most high-speed chases, this flat rule -- the "Scott v . [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's recent 4th amendment decision in a police chase case, Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
" Given the inherent dangerousness of most high-speed chases, this flat rule -- the "Scott v . [read post]
1 May 2007, 4:08 am
The case is called Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:30 am
Today the SCOTUS ruled in Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:27 pm
From washingtonpost.com: The Supreme Court today handed an important victory to police officers who are involved in high-speed chases, and took the unusual step of posting a videotape of the chase on its Web site to show that the now-paralyzed... [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Cobb v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:35 pm
The Supreme Court issued an 8-1, precedential decision in Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
Harris, the high speed car chase case from last Term: Whose Eyes are... [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
Michael Lewis Wells (University of Georgia Law School) has posted Scott V. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:13 am
Last post I discussed the decision in Scott Call Jolley v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:01 am
That is a reasonable way of summing up Monday's argument in the case of Scott v. [read post]
