Search for: "Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
District of Columbia today, I was struck by a passage discussing the Second Militia Act, passed by Congress in 1792. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:13 pm
United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004)). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Rather, “in light of the analysis in [United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:39 am
Cheney v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:01 am
White, 275 F.3d 1208, 1210 (10th Cir.2002) (same); Cheney v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in an effort to enjoin the use of proxy voting. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 8:18 pm
United States, 441 F.3d 220, 227-28 (4th Cir.2006) (discussing holdings of the various Circuit Courts of Appeal); Solis-Alarcon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
United States and General Dynamics v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
When the court decided MA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Cheney, the District Court of the District of Columbia ruled that Congress can NOT create standing for a dispute between the Congress and the President. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia that the information sought by the committee “is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversaries. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
The privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are denied to these plaintiffs by the government’s unconstitutional actions described here. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:36 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to warrant interlocutory review through a writ of mandamus. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Could the United States find a way forward one year after the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack? [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, has ruled in Klayman v. [read post]
