Search for: "Chevron Corp. v. Donziger" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Chevron Corp. v Steven Donziger, et al., 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. 2012), is the District Court’s most recent order in the array of cases concerning the multibillion judgment enetered against Chevron in Ecuador. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
" And among the "Recent Cases" write-ups are: Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Case of the Day is Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Donziger v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:57 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Chevron, Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetić
The Court of Appeal for Ontario in Lloyd’s v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:58 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Kaplan's ruling Wednesday in In re Application of Chevron Corp., 10 MC 00002, stands, Chevron's counsel from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and counsel for two former Chevron lawyers facing criminal charges in Ecuador will be able to ask lead plaintiffs attorney Steven Donziger questions, under oath, about his alleged attempts to influence a supposedly neutral expert appointed by the Ecuadorean court to offer a global damages assessment. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Baker] Chevron used racketeering law to fend off giant foreign judgment in Ecuador saga, losing side would like Supreme Court relief from that [Paul Barrett, Business Week on Donziger v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although plaintiffs were aware of the alleged misconduct during the pendency of the prior foreclosure action, they are not precluded from bringing a plenary action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 provided that they are not collaterally attacking the judgment from the prior action (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP, 135 AD3d 547, 554 [2016]; Chevron Corp. v Donziger, 871 F Supp 2d 229, 261-262 [2012]; see generally… [read post]