Search for: "Chicago v. Taylor" Results 81 - 100 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Emily Taylor has a piece in the Guardian entitled, “Five strategies for reclaiming our personal privacy online” Freedom of Information That the Independent Commission on FOI has received 30,000 responses to their consultation and will invited some parties to provide oral evidence  on 20 and 25 January 2016. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Chicago, the editorial board at the Chicago Tribune – anticipating a decision in favor of the petitioners – urges the City to adopt “some new and sensible legislating” to protect its citizens from gun violence. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/7hdOoGDZjr -> Jared Leto Loses Lawsuit Over TMZ's Taylor Swift Diss Video https://t.co/qgasiSiT5T -> Olympic stadium T-shirt violates copyright law, Montreal designer told https://t.co/ziXY39JoqF -> New global consumer research by IFPI includes Canadian figures https://t.co/gBOcOK4rzz -> REDUCING RISKS: Court Finds Copyright Act Does Not Preempt State Trade Secret Claim https://t.co/P5OEvNmr8F -> ABC And Yahoo Sued By Father Who Streamed Baby's Birth… [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Many of our attorneys will be meeting Kriton for the first time in Chicago in May, so this is a good opportunity to learn a little more about him first! [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am by Eric Goldman
” And in Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Stone (Univ. of Chicago Law School) Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) STC.UNM – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-729) regarding certain Semiconductor Products (ITC Law Blog) TheraSense – PSA for TheraSense amici: Filing permission must be requested (Patently-O) TheraSense – Changing the law of inequitable conduct – Abbot briefs its case: TheraSense v Becton Dickinson (Patently-O) US Copyright Bratz v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Int’l v TradeHelm (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Westinghouse Solar – New complaint filed [read post]