Search for: "Children's Health Defense v. Federal Communications Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
Our partners, Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), Women’s Refugee Commission (WRC),and Justice in Motion will serve as members of the Steering Committee, and will, among other tasks, facilitate communication regarding the wishes of parents and children who are still separated, and provide in-country support for locating deported parents. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
The opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
The opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Placement)Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Visalia, California -based Magnolia Health Corporation and its affiliates (Magnolia) highlights the need for healthcare industry and other U.S. employers adequacy and defensibility of their practices for offering accommodation to, hiring, screening and other employment practices with respect to persons with actual or perceived disabilities in light of the EEOC’s prioritization of disability discrimination… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:50 pm
§ 3553(f)(1)–(5); US v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
KomosinskiDesignee of Department Children and Families: Erin O’Leary, Esq.For purposes of convenience and operational consistency, the Commission has been formallyplaced in, but not of, the Department of Law & Public Safety. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Placement)Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:22 pm
In the Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
The Congressional-Executive Commission on China was created by the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for its refusal to hire a child care worker with cerebral palsy. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
information–Children’s Health Defense v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
The increase is intended to provide relief to physicians and other clinicians during the COVID-19 public health emergency. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
"Graham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In finding that the government’s decision constituted discrimination, Justice La Forest for the Court noted: In order to receive the same quality of care, deaf persons must bear the burden of paying for the means to communicate with their health care providers, despite the fact that the system is intended to make ability to pay irrelevant … Once it is accepted that effective communication is an indispensable component of the delivery of medical services, it… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
