Search for: "Childs v. Gross" Results 1 - 20 of 867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
For example, lump-sum alimony or alimony in gross normally would be paid even if the recipient remarries. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
For example, lump-sum alimony or alimony in gross normally would be paid even if the recipient remarries. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
If the private foundation pays compensation that is deemed “unreasonable” to certain related parties the consequences are severe.[25] In the case of a 501(c)(4), compensation is permitted to a related party, however, as mentioned earlier in this article, the excess benefit transaction rules still apply to a 501(c)(4), and thus, a determination of “reasonable compensation” by the 501(c)(4) when making payments to a related party is still needed. [26] A situation that may… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:01 am by Laura
The best interest and welfare of the child remain the paramount concern of the court when determining child maintenance. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The appeal panel concluded that the applicant “had overcome a gross dereliction of his responsibilities and established his present good character” [emphasis added].[3] Perhaps unsurprisingly, various media outlets were critical of the Melnick appeal decision, reporting it with headlines such as “Sex offender allowed to practice law in Ontario after he lost teaching licence over child luring conviction” and “London-area teacher who seduced his… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  In more rural areas, the county attorney’s office for that jurisdiction will prosecute the petty misdemeanors, misdemeanors, and gross misdemeanors that occur within the cities, townships, and municipalities. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
In the words of the court: These facts depict a sequence of events that are gross, degrading, and deeply concerning. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:50 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
However, disagreements can arise even after an order is in place, which is what happened in Erickson v. [read post]