Search for: "Childs v. Gross"
Results 61 - 80
of 849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 5:32 am
In Weiss v Gross, Docket No. 308804, Decided July 17, 2012 [Unpublished], the court of appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of the mother's request to change the child's school district. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Resource: Wetzel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
Bell Unreimbursed business expenses may not be deducted from the gross income of an employed parent in calculating child support. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:51 pm
In the Arizona Court of Appeals case of Patterson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:51 pm
In the Arizona Court of Appeals case of Patterson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Sherman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The revised guidelines change the law regarding the application of SSD benefits, and the holding in Hieston v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The child drowned, and the parents filed suit. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:47 am
On October 24, 2008, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided Ziegler v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Such was the issue addressed in last week’s decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Monaco v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:26 pm
In the Arizona Court of Appeals case of Patterson v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:14 am
” Of course, this will vary by state, but most child support rules are codified in state statutes which require reasonable and necessary medical and dental expenses to be divided in proportion to the parents’ gross income. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:41 am
Mendez v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:28 pm
Section 1.213-1(e)(1)(v)(a). [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
Unfortunately, if brought in the Family Court, these petitions suffer from certain jurisdictional defects as demonstrated in Savini v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Family Opinions Body: AC36333 - Hendricks v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:49 am
” Lowe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:21 am
The New Jersey divorce judge should not have used a percentage of defendant's gross income to fix alimony and child support. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:39 am
Young v. [read post]
