Search for: "Choctaw Nation v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2022, 12:21 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-1191Issue: Whether federal district courts exceed their statutory or Article III power by issuing proclamations that their dismissal “counts as a ‘strike’ within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
McGirt received praise throughout the United States from tribal nations and federal Indian Law practitioners for Justice Gorsuch’s strong affirmation of the Muscogee Creek’s sovereignty over its reservation and the honoring of treaties made between the United States and the Muscogee Creek Nation. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
In August 2020, Parish, convicted and sentenced in Oklahoma court for second-degree murder, filed a petition for post-conviction relief on the grounds that he is a member of the Choctaw Nation and that his crime occurred within the historical boundaries of the Choctaw Nation. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
       In the aftermath of Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Wilda Wahpepah
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am by Lyle Denniston
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, whether Indian tribal courts have authority to try cases against non-Indian businesses and individuals involved in commercial dealings with the tribe; and, in Bruce v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University  COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Finally, Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Tanner Allread  On June 15, Indian Country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Haaland v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But the United States or the Court cannot grant to Indian nations power the tribes already possess. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by David Kopel
L. 294 (2000) (cited in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Oklahoma Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations just reached a water rights deal with the state of Oklahoma. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]