Search for: "Chris Buccafusco"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
[Chris Buccafusco and I have a paper in progress about this.] [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:41 am
(I’m working on a paper with Chris Buccafusco now about this problem in music copyright cases.) [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 8:19 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2021-2022 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Panel 24 – Remedies: Thomas F. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Chris Sprigman: Did you cut by age, not just gender? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Timothy J. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:41 am
There is also considerable work confirming the negative effects from legal scholars such as Paul Heald, Chris Buccafusco, and Rebecca Giblin (among others). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 2: Legal Protection for DesignIntroduction: Chris Sprigman: what kinds of protection should be available depends on what the justifications for protection are. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:52 am
The latest such article for me is The Design Patent Bar: An Occupational Licensing Failure, by Chris Buccafusco and Jeanne Curtis (both of Cardozo Law). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
"Melissa Wasserman & Chris Walker – PTAB adjudication is not unusual except that agency head lacks final decision-making authority. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
The Court overturned decades of circuit court cases without comment and did away with a central & widely accepted feature of doctrine. https://t.co/Q9ypR3FSfz — Chris Buccafusco (@cjbuccafusco) March 22, 2017 If it’s not clear, that was a response to the prior tweet. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
An Academic Discussion of Policy Choices in Designing a Publicity/Privacy Rights Regime: Rothman, Buccafusco, & TushnetThe roundtable is on the proposed changes to NY's ROP, which are very extensive. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Now, that might just shift the intentionalism/institutionalism Q to the defense side, but it might also take care of many of the situations where we think there are competitive issues distinct from what we think of as the “real” point of ©.A: it’s hard to talk about protectability of useful articles w/o also talking about thickness of ©.Chris Buccafusco: the opinion lacks formalist analysis. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:07 am
., the terrific recent articles by Chris Buccafusco and Mark Lemley and by Mark McKenna and Chris Sprigman). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm
Buccafusco: independent creation is required for patentability (though not infringement). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm
Chris Buccafusco & Mark Lemley, Screening FunctionalityCommentators: Abraham Drassinower and Jim GibsonGibson: regime shopping is even more troublesome than scope problems in one regime. [read post]
