Search for: "Chris Lund" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 5:55 pm by Dan Markel
Johnson (UND); Chris Lund (Wayne); Dave Fagundes (Southwestern); and my beloved co-author, Jennifer Collins (WFU). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Greg Jenner
Energy David Benson at (206) 386-7584 or Email John Eustermann at (208) 387-4218 or Email Bill Holmes at (503) 294-9207 or Email Morten Lund at (858) 794-4103 or Email Alan Merkle at (206) 386-7636 or Email Julia Pettit at (801) 578-6958 or Email David Quinby at (612) 373-4104 or Email Howard Susman at (858) 794-4111 or Email Tax … [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:52 am by Howard Wasserman
(H/T: Christopher Lund, from a debate on the Law and Religion listserv). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:56 pm by Dan Markel
We had ten very interesting early works in progress to discuss by (in no order) Chris Lund, Verity Winship, Howard Wasserman, Mike Cahill, Bill Araiza, Giovanna Shay, Marc Blitz, myself, Hillel Levin, and Katy Kuh. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
To celebrate the occasion, the firm invited 8 distinguished guests, including golfer Chris DiMarco; RSM McGladrey President and COO C.E. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Chris Lund found the memo itself, and I uploaded it; the California Supreme Court opinions are here, and a brief explanation of the history of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is here. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm by Dan Markel
 Our current list of attendees and/or presenters include: Mike Cahill, Miriam Baer, Nelson Tebbe, Verity Winship, Bill Araiza, Katy Kuh, Hillel Levin, Howard Wasserman, Giovanna Shay, Chris Lund, and Marc Blitz (and me). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Mary's Univeristy Jamie Lund; JD 2006 University of Chicago; ; Intellectual Property, Business Associations Syracuse University College of Law Tara Helfman; JD 2006 Yale University; MA 2001 University College London (Legal and Political Theory), MPhil 2000 Cambridge (Political Thought and Intellectual History); Olin Fellow and Searle Fellow New York University; International Law, Legal History Texas Tech University School of Law Genevieve Beyea; JD 2008 New York University; ;… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Matt Sundquist
And finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Craig Lerner and Nelson Lund discuss their draft article suggesting that the Court should move to anonymous opinions to discourage individual justices from writing conflicting opinions. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
We're fortunate to have Andy Hessick (ASU); Asli Bali (UCLA), and Chris Lund (Wayne) join us as discussants also. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Buono, argued last week, continues with a new post by Chris Lund at Prawfs Blog. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:09 am by B.C. Barnes
Chris Lund who left us this past summer to go to Wayne State Law had a blog post of his mentioned on the nationally known SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
Also at PrawfsBlawg, Chris Lund expands on his blog's argument with respect to the ABA Journal article in "What I Would Have Said … Reflections on Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearings. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:44 am
Fellow guest-prawf Chris Lund, in a post Friday, pointed to some interesting remarks made by Justice Scalia - namely his worry that society may be "devoting too many of our very best minds" to the legal profession. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:24 pm
Johnson (UND); Nadine Farid (Gonzaga); Chris Lund (MC); and David Schleicher (George Mason). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
  A draft of Chris Lund's piece is already available on SSRN. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 6:32 am
What a lineup.My thanks are extended also to Don Braman, Verity Winship, Chris Lund, and Austen Parrish for their wonderful contributions. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
A few weeks ago, Chris Lund asked whether it was "crazy" to ask what it meant when I pointed out that Mike Newdow, of "under God" fame, had agreed to write the theme song for my book Holy Hullabaloos. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:12 pm
  As Chris Lund's on-the-spot Feb. 25th post pointed out, the Establishment Clause questions so prevalent in the press, and at oral argument, were glossed over to get that 9-0 judgment. [read post]